Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Wealth Empowerment Academy
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-16 20:00:35
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (1695)
Related
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Philadelphia LGBTQ leaders arrested in traffic stop the mayor calls ‘concerning’
- Biden says U.S. will airdrop humanitarian aid to Gaza
- 2024 NFL mock draft: Six QBs land in top 16 picks of post-combine shake-up
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Idina Menzel wishes 'Adele Dazeem' a happy birthday 10 years after John Travolta gaffe
- What will Fed chair say about interest rates? Key economy news you need to know this week.
- Rotting bodies, fake ashes and sold body parts push Colorado to patch lax funeral home rules
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- 'Dune: Part Two' rides great reviews, starry young cast to $81.5 million debut
Ranking
- Chief beer officer for Yard House: A side gig that comes with a daily swig.
- One Tech Tip: Change these settings on X to limit calls and hide your IP address
- Brian Austin Green Details “Freaking Out” With Jealousy During Tiffani Thiessen Romance
- Police search for 3 suspects after house party shooting leaves 4 dead, 3 injured in California
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Caitlin Clark is among college basketball's greats, with or without an NCAA title
- La comunidad hispana reacciona al debate sobre inmigración tras el asesinato de una estudiante
- A man is found guilty of killing, dismembering a woman after taking out life insurance in her name
Recommendation
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
DeSantis names Disney World admin to run elections in Democratic Orange County
With a million cases of dengue so far this year, Brazil is in a state of emergency
Rep. Mike Turner says aid to Ukraine is critical: We have to support them now or they will lose
Taylor Swift Cancels Austria Concerts After Confirmation of Planned Terrorist Attack
Sleepy bears > shining moments: March Napness brings bracketology to tired sanctuary bears
Handcuffed Colorado man stunned by Taser settles lawsuit for $1.5 million, lawyers say
In 1807, a ship was seized by the British navy, the crew jailed and the cargo taken. Archivists just opened the packages.